PA Dimensional Variances: Win Your Argument!

Understanding dimensional variances in Pennsylvania zoning law hinges on grasping the authority granted to the Zoning Hearing Board. These boards frequently adjudicate requests based on hardships, often tied to challenging property features in locations such as Pittsburgh. Therefore, mastering the nuances of dimensional variances arguments pennsylvania is critical for achieving favorable outcomes when advocating before these bodies.

Image taken from the YouTube channel Cornerstone Law Firm, LLC , from the video titled Zoning Variances in Pennsylvania .

Pennsylvania's landscape is a patchwork of diverse communities, each with its own unique character and development goals.

Zoning laws are the primary tools used to shape this development, and at the heart of these laws lie dimensional requirements.

But what happens when strict adherence to these requirements creates an unnecessary hardship for a property owner? The answer often lies in the dimensional variance.

What is a Dimensional Variance?

In the realm of Pennsylvania zoning laws, a dimensional variance provides relief from specific dimensional requirements imposed by local ordinances.

These requirements typically dictate aspects such as:

• Setbacks (the distance a structure must be from property lines)
• Height restrictions
• Lot size
• Building coverage

When a property owner faces unique circumstances that make strict compliance with these rules unduly burdensome, they can seek a dimensional variance.

Why Dimensional Variances Matter

Understanding dimensional variances is crucial for both landowners and developers in Pennsylvania.

Consider a property with an unusual shape or significant topographical challenges.

Strict adherence to setback requirements might render a portion of the lot unusable, preventing reasonable development.

In such instances, a dimensional variance could be the key to unlocking the property's full potential, allowing for construction or renovation that would otherwise be impossible.

Moreover, municipalities also benefit from a clear understanding of dimensional variances.

These mechanisms allow zoning laws to be applied flexibly, ensuring that regulations serve the community's best interests without imposing undue hardship on individual property owners.

This balance between regulation and flexibility is essential for responsible land use planning.

Navigating the Variance Process: Our Goal

This article aims to equip readers with a clear understanding of dimensional variances in Pennsylvania.

Whether you are a landowner seeking to develop your property, a neighbor concerned about a proposed project, or a developer navigating the complexities of zoning regulations, this guide is for you.

We will explore the legal framework governing dimensional variances, the standards for obtaining them, and the strategies for effectively arguing for or against their approval.

Ultimately, our goal is to empower you with the knowledge needed to navigate the often-intricate world of Pennsylvania zoning and land use law.

Pennsylvania's landscape is a patchwork of diverse communities, each with its own unique character and development goals. Zoning laws are the primary tools used to shape this development, and at the heart of these laws lie dimensional requirements. But what happens when strict adherence to these requirements creates an unnecessary hardship for a property owner? The answer often lies in the dimensional variance.

Dimensional variances, as we’ve seen, are a crucial mechanism for balancing regulation with individual property rights. However, understanding them requires delving into the legal framework that governs land use in Pennsylvania. This framework is primarily defined by the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, or MPC.

Navigating the Legal Landscape: The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC)

The Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC) serves as the backbone of land use regulation throughout the Commonwealth. It empowers municipalities to enact zoning ordinances, which in turn dictate how land can be used and developed.

The MPC's Role in Establishing Dimensional Requirements

The MPC doesn't directly set dimensional requirements. Instead, it provides the legal authority for municipalities to do so through their local zoning ordinances.

These ordinances, guided by the MPC, establish specific rules related to building size, placement, and density. They aim to promote orderly development and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community.

Defining Essential Terms: Setbacks, Height Restrictions, and Lot Size

To fully grasp the impact of dimensional requirements and the need for variances, it's essential to define some key terms:

• Setbacks: These are the required distances a structure must be from property lines, roads, or other features. Setbacks ensure adequate light, air, and space between buildings and protect public rights-of-way.

• Height Restrictions: These limit the maximum height of buildings in a specific zoning district. Height restrictions can preserve views, maintain neighborhood character, and prevent overcrowding.

• Lot Size: This refers to the minimum area required for a building lot in a particular zone. Lot size requirements control density and ensure adequate open space and infrastructure capacity.

Understanding these dimensional aspects is critical because they directly impact a property owner's ability to develop or modify their land. When these requirements become overly restrictive due to unique circumstances, a dimensional variance may be the only recourse.

Dimensional Variances vs. Use Variances: Avoiding Confusion

It's vital to distinguish between dimensional variances and use variances. While both offer relief from zoning regulations, they address fundamentally different issues.

A dimensional variance, as discussed, concerns deviations from dimensional requirements like setbacks or height limits.

A use variance, on the other hand, allows a property owner to use their land for a purpose that is not permitted in the zoning district. For example, operating a commercial business in a residential zone.

Use variances are generally more difficult to obtain than dimensional variances because they represent a more significant departure from the zoning ordinance. This article focuses specifically on dimensional variances.

The Purpose of Zoning and the Flexibility of Variances

Zoning laws are designed to promote orderly and compatible land use within a community. They aim to prevent conflicting uses, protect property values, and ensure access to essential services.

However, strict adherence to zoning regulations can sometimes lead to unintended consequences, particularly when applied to properties with unique physical characteristics or unforeseen circumstances.

Dimensional variances provide a crucial safety valve in the zoning system. They allow municipalities to address individual hardships without undermining the overall goals of the zoning ordinance. By granting variances in appropriate cases, municipalities can ensure that zoning regulations are applied fairly and equitably, promoting both responsible land use and individual property rights.

Dimensional variances, as we’ve seen, are a crucial mechanism for balancing regulation with individual property rights. However, understanding them requires delving into the legal framework that governs land use in Pennsylvania. This framework is primarily defined by the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, or MPC.

Building Your Case: The Legal Framework and Pennsylvania Courts

Obtaining a dimensional variance in Pennsylvania is not simply a matter of asking; it's a legal process governed by specific procedures and standards. Understanding this framework is essential for anyone seeking or opposing a variance. The process, responsibilities, burdens, and standards are all set forth in the MPC and interpreted by Pennsylvania Courts.

Navigating the Variance Process: From Application to Appeal

The process begins with an application to the local Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB). This application must clearly state the dimensional variance requested and the grounds upon which it is sought. It's crucial to be as specific and detailed as possible, providing supporting documentation such as surveys, site plans, and photographs.

After the application is filed, the ZHB will schedule a public hearing. Notice of the hearing must be given to the applicant, surrounding property owners, and any other interested parties as defined by the municipality. This hearing is a quasi-judicial proceeding where evidence is presented, and testimony is taken.

Following the hearing, the ZHB will render a decision, either granting or denying the variance. If the variance is denied, the applicant has the right to appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of the county in which the property is located. This appeal must be filed within 30 days of the ZHB's decision. Further appeals can be made to the Commonwealth Court and, ultimately, to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, although such appeals are rare.

The Role of the Zoning Hearing Board

The Zoning Hearing Board plays a pivotal role in the variance process. ZHB members are appointed officials tasked with interpreting the zoning ordinance and applying it to specific situations. They are not elected officials, and are appointed by the local government.

Their responsibilities include conducting hearings, reviewing evidence, and making decisions on variance requests. ZHB members must act impartially and base their decisions on the evidence presented and the applicable law. They must also create a written record of all proceedings.

The ZHB’s decision must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. This means that there must be enough credible evidence to justify the decision, even if there is also evidence to the contrary.

The Applicant's Burden of Proof

In Pennsylvania, the burden of proof rests squarely on the applicant seeking the dimensional variance. This means the applicant must convince the ZHB that they are entitled to the variance under the law. The applicant must demonstrate that unnecessary hardship will result if the variance is not granted, that the hardship arises from unique physical circumstances or conditions of the property, that the hardship was not self-created, and that the variance will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare.

Land Use Law significantly impacts this burden. Pennsylvania courts have consistently held that zoning regulations are presumed valid, and the burden of proving otherwise rests on the challenger. This presumption of validity makes it even more challenging for an applicant to obtain a variance.

The Standard for Granting a Dimensional Variance: Unnecessary Hardship

The cornerstone of any successful dimensional variance application is demonstrating unnecessary hardship. This is not merely inconvenience or financial hardship; it must be a substantial and compelling disadvantage that prevents the reasonable use of the property.

Defining "Hardship"

The hardship must arise from unique physical circumstances or conditions of the property, such as irregular lot shape, steep topography, or unusual soil conditions. These conditions must be unique to the property and not generally applicable to other properties in the neighborhood.

For example, a narrow lot that cannot accommodate a required setback due to its unusual shape may present a valid hardship. Similarly, a property with steep slopes that make it impossible to build a structure in compliance with height restrictions may also qualify.

The Pitfalls of Self-Created Hardship

A critical consideration is whether the hardship was self-created. A self-created hardship is one that arises from the applicant's own actions or decisions. For instance, purchasing a property knowing that it does not comply with existing zoning regulations, and then requesting a variance, is generally considered a self-created hardship.

Pennsylvania courts have consistently held that self-created hardships cannot justify the granting of a dimensional variance. However, the concept of self-created hardship is not always straightforward. If the hardship is only partially self-created, the ZHB must consider whether the unique physical characteristics of the property independently contribute to the hardship.

Due Process Rights in Variance Proceedings

All parties involved in a variance proceeding are entitled to Due Process rights under the law. This includes the right to notice of the hearing, the right to present evidence and testimony, the right to cross-examine witnesses, and the right to a fair and impartial decision.

The ZHB must conduct the hearing in a manner that ensures all parties have a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The ZHB must also base its decision on the evidence presented and not on personal opinions or biases.

The Power of Case Law and Legal Precedent

Case law and legal precedent play a crucial role in dimensional variance cases. Pennsylvania courts have established a body of law interpreting the MPC and defining the standards for granting variances.

Referencing relevant case law can significantly strengthen an argument for or against a variance. For example, citing a case where a similar hardship was deemed sufficient to justify a variance can be persuasive. Conversely, citing a case where a self-created hardship was held to be a bar to a variance can be equally effective.

Understanding and effectively using legal precedent is essential for navigating the complex legal landscape of dimensional variances in Pennsylvania. Consulting with a qualified land use attorney is highly recommended to ensure that all legal arguments are properly presented and supported by relevant case law.

Building a solid case, understanding the legal framework, and knowing the intricacies of Pennsylvania courts are essential foundations. But to truly succeed in obtaining (or opposing) a dimensional variance, strategic execution is paramount.

Strategies for Success: Winning Your Dimensional Variance Argument

Winning a dimensional variance case in Pennsylvania hinges on a multi-faceted approach. It requires not only a deep understanding of the law, but also the ability to present a compelling narrative, supported by solid evidence and persuasive legal arguments. This section provides a roadmap to maximize your chances of a favorable outcome.

Presenting a Compelling Case for Hardship

The cornerstone of any successful dimensional variance application is demonstrating unnecessary hardship. This hardship must stem from unique physical characteristics of the property, and not from personal or economic considerations.

Documenting Existing Conditions

Thorough documentation is critical. This includes detailed surveys, accurate site plans, and compelling photographs illustrating the existing conditions that create the alleged hardship.

For instance, if steep slopes prevent building within the required setback, photographic evidence and topographical surveys must clearly showcase this limitation. Consider engaging a qualified surveyor to prepare a certified survey.

Demonstrating Minimum Necessary Relief

It's not enough to simply request a variance; you must demonstrate that the requested variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the hardship. This means exploring all other possible options and demonstrating why they are not feasible.

Could a redesign of the structure mitigate the need for the variance? Have alternative site plans been considered? The ZHB will scrutinize your efforts to minimize the deviation from zoning requirements.

Proving No Negative Impact

A crucial element is demonstrating that the variance will not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood or community. This requires careful consideration of potential impacts on neighboring properties, such as increased noise, traffic, or stormwater runoff.

Consider presenting evidence that the variance will actually enhance the property's aesthetic appeal or improve its functionality. A well-designed project can often mitigate concerns about negative impacts.

Legal Arguments and Supporting Evidence

Beyond demonstrating hardship, a successful case relies on strong legal arguments supported by credible evidence.

Highlighting Unique Property Characteristics

Emphasize any unique physical characteristics of the property that contribute to the hardship. This might include unusual topography, an irregular lot shape, or the presence of natural features such as wetlands or streams.

These characteristics must be clearly documented and presented to the ZHB in a way that highlights their impact on the property's usability.

The Value of Expert Testimony

Expert testimony from qualified surveyors, engineers, or architects can be invaluable. These professionals can provide objective evidence and opinions to support your claims.

A surveyor can verify property boundaries and topography, an engineer can assess structural limitations, and an architect can provide design solutions that minimize the need for a variance.

Demonstrating Compliance

While seeking a dimensional variance, demonstrating compliance with all other applicable regulations is essential. This shows that you are not seeking to circumvent the entire zoning ordinance, but rather to obtain relief from a specific dimensional requirement due to unique circumstances.

Be prepared to address any potential concerns about compliance with building codes, stormwater management regulations, or other applicable local ordinances.

Knowing and Using Legal Precedent

Legal precedent plays a crucial role in variance cases. Research relevant case law in Pennsylvania to identify similar cases and how they were decided. Citing favorable precedents can strengthen your arguments and persuade the ZHB to rule in your favor.

Conversely, be prepared to distinguish your case from unfavorable precedents. Understanding the nuances of prior rulings is key to crafting a persuasive legal argument.

Demonstrating Good Faith Efforts

Demonstrating good faith efforts to comply with existing zoning laws is important. This shows the ZHB that you are not intentionally disregarding the regulations, but rather seeking a reasonable accommodation due to unforeseen circumstances.

Document any attempts you have made to comply with the zoning ordinance, and explain why those efforts have been unsuccessful.

Preparing for Potential Appeals

Even with a well-prepared case, there is always a possibility that the ZHB will deny your variance application. Therefore, it is essential to prepare for a potential appeal to the Court of Common Pleas.

Understand the deadlines and procedures for filing an appeal, and gather all necessary documentation and evidence. Be prepared to present your case in a clear and concise manner to the court.

The Role of Experienced Lawyers

Navigating the complex variance process can be challenging, particularly for those unfamiliar with Pennsylvania land use law. An experienced land use attorney can provide invaluable assistance.

An attorney can help you assess the merits of your case, gather evidence, prepare legal arguments, and represent you before the ZHB and the courts.

Protection of Property Rights

Seeking a dimensional variance can be viewed as an effort to protect your property rights. Zoning regulations should not unduly restrict the use and enjoyment of your land.

A well-argued variance case can help strike a balance between the community's zoning goals and your individual property rights. By demonstrating unnecessary hardship and a lack of negative impact, you can persuade the ZHB or the courts to grant the relief you seek.

Video: PA Dimensional Variances: Win Your Argument!

Play Video