PA & MD's Hidden History: What Were They Founded to Provide?

Examining the foundational principles of colonial America reveals intriguing nuances. Religious Freedom, as championed by figures like William Penn, heavily influenced the establishment of both Pennsylvania and Maryland. The economic realities of the Atlantic Trade also played a crucial role; both pennsylvania and maryland were founded to provide, to varying degrees, resources and trade opportunities. The concept of Proprietary Colonies directly shaped governance in these regions, granting significant authority to individuals such as Lord Baltimore in Maryland. Consequently, each colony's initial purpose reflected a complex interplay of religious aspirations, economic necessities, and distinct governance models.

Image taken from the YouTube channel Historical Conquest , from the video titled W10:D2 - Colonial Life - Maryland and Pennsylvania as English Colonies The Adventure Box Podcast .

Pennsylvania and Maryland stand as two cornerstones in the narrative of early American history. Their stories, often presented as distinct and self-contained, hold deeper connections than commonly acknowledged. While history books typically paint Pennsylvania as the embodiment of Quaker ideals and Maryland as a Catholic refuge, a closer examination reveals a shared ambition: the creation of societies founded on principles of religious freedom, refuge, and uniquely defined societal ideals.

Pennsylvania and Maryland: Pivotal Colonies

Both Pennsylvania and Maryland occupied pivotal positions in the nascent American landscape. Pennsylvania, founded later in 1681, quickly became a hub of progressive thought and religious tolerance under the leadership of William Penn. Maryland, established nearly half a century earlier in 1632, served as a sanctuary for Catholics facing persecution in England. Both colonies, however, attracted diverse populations seeking opportunity and freedom from oppression.

Challenging the Common Understanding

It's easy to assume a complete understanding of their founding narratives. We often learn about Penn's "Holy Experiment" and Lord Baltimore's vision for a Catholic haven, and stop there. This simplified view obscures the nuanced realities and common threads that wove through the early development of these two colonies.

The reality is more intricate than these surface-level summaries suggest.

Thesis: A Shared Foundation of Ideals

While Pennsylvania and Maryland were indeed founded with distinct intentions rooted in specific religious contexts, their aspirations converged on several fundamental goals. This article posits that both colonies shared underlying aims:

• Providing a haven for those seeking religious freedom.
• Offering refuge to specific religious groups facing persecution.
• Establishing societies based on particular, though not identical, ideals of governance and social order.

By examining these shared aspirations, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the complex motivations that shaped these two vital colonies and their enduring impact on the American experiment.

While these shared ambitions provided common ground, the specific historical contexts and motivations that drove the founding of each colony differed substantially. Let's begin by examining Maryland, a colony conceived as a refuge for a specific religious group facing intense persecution.

Maryland: A Catholic Haven Under Lord Baltimore

Cecil Calvert, the 2nd Baron Baltimore, played a pivotal role in the establishment of Maryland. His motivations stemmed from a deep concern for the well-being of English Catholics, who faced significant discrimination and legal restrictions in their homeland.

The Plight of English Catholics

Understanding Lord Baltimore's actions requires grasping the religious climate in 17th-century England. Catholics were subject to harsh penalties, including fines, imprisonment, and exclusion from public office.

The Act of Supremacy of 1534, which declared the English monarch the head of the Church of England, effectively criminalized adherence to the Catholic faith. This created a precarious environment for Catholics who wished to practice their religion openly.

Lord Baltimore's Vision

Lord Baltimore envisioned Maryland as a sanctuary where Catholics could live and worship freely, without fear of persecution. He sought to create a society where religious belief would not be a barrier to participation in civic life.

He hoped to establish a colony where Catholics could not only practice their faith openly but also thrive economically and socially. This vision extended beyond mere survival; it aimed at creating a vibrant and self-sufficient Catholic community in the New World.

The Act Concerning Religion (Toleration Act) of 1649

In 1649, the Maryland Assembly passed the Act Concerning Religion, often referred to as the Toleration Act. This landmark legislation was a significant step towards religious freedom in the colony.

It mandated tolerance for all Christians, regardless of their specific denomination. While not extending to non-Christians, it offered a level of protection for various Christian groups that was rare in the colonies at the time.

Significance of the Act

The Toleration Act of 1649 holds significant historical importance for several reasons:

First, it represents one of the earliest legal guarantees of religious freedom in colonial America.

Second, it demonstrated Lord Baltimore's commitment to creating a society where people of different faiths could coexist peacefully.

Third, it set a precedent for future legislation promoting religious tolerance in the United States.

Limitations and Challenges

It's important to note that the Toleration Act was not without its limitations. It only extended to Christians, and its enforcement was not always consistent.

Furthermore, the act was later repealed during a period of Protestant dominance in Maryland. Despite these challenges, the Toleration Act remains a crucial milestone in the history of religious freedom in America.

Maryland: A Pioneer of Religious Toleration

Maryland's founding as a Catholic haven and its enactment of the Toleration Act of 1649 marked a bold experiment in religious tolerance. The colony became the first in America to legislate religious tolerance.

While the colony’s history was complex and marked by periods of both inclusion and exclusion, Maryland's early commitment to religious freedom laid a foundation for the broader development of religious liberty in the United States.

Cecil Calvert’s vision for Maryland provides a fascinating case study in the pursuit of religious freedom. However, it was not the only experiment in tolerance unfolding in the New World. Another colony, driven by a different set of ideals and spearheaded by a charismatic leader, was also striving to create a society founded on principles of liberty and equality.

Pennsylvania: William Penn and the Holy Experiment

William Penn, a prominent English Quaker, founded Pennsylvania on principles that diverged from, yet also resonated with, those of Lord Baltimore. Penn's vision extended beyond mere religious tolerance; he aimed to create a "Holy Experiment," a society governed by Quaker principles of peace, equality, and brotherly love.

The Quaker Influence

The Religious Society of Friends, or Quakers, profoundly shaped Pennsylvania's identity. Their core beliefs included:

• Inner Light: The belief that every individual possesses an inner light of divine truth, making formal religious structures less necessary.

• Pacifism: A commitment to non-violence and the rejection of war.

• Equality: The conviction that all people are created equal, regardless of gender, race, or social status.

These tenets translated into a society that valued religious freedom, fair treatment of Native Americans, and a commitment to peaceful resolution of conflicts.

Penn's Vision for Pennsylvania

Penn envisioned Pennsylvania as a haven for the persecuted and a model for just governance. He secured a land grant from King Charles II in 1681, partly to settle a debt owed to his father. Penn used this opportunity to put his ideals into action.

His vision for Pennsylvania included:

• Religious Freedom: Guaranteeing freedom of worship for all who believed in God.

  You also like

  Greyhound Harrisburg PA: Ultimate Guide, Prices & Tips!

• Representative Government: Establishing an assembly elected by landowners to create laws.

• Fair Treatment of Native Americans: Negotiating treaties with Native tribes and paying them fairly for their land.

The "Holy Experiment"

The "Holy Experiment" was Penn's ambitious attempt to create a society based on Quaker principles.

This involved:

• Creating a Frame of Government: Penn developed a constitution that emphasized individual rights and liberties.

• Promoting Religious Tolerance: Pennsylvania became a refuge for various religious groups, including Quakers, Mennonites, Amish, and others seeking freedom from persecution.

• Upholding Justice and Equity: Penn strived to create a legal system that was fair and impartial to all.

Contrasting Approaches to Religious Tolerance

While both Maryland and Pennsylvania championed religious freedom, their approaches differed significantly.

• Maryland's Toleration Act: Primarily aimed at protecting Catholics, it did not extend to all religious groups.

• Pennsylvania's Broad Tolerance: Penn’s vision embraced a wider spectrum of religious beliefs, fostering a more diverse and inclusive society.

Penn's commitment to treating Native Americans with respect also set Pennsylvania apart. He believed in peaceful coexistence and negotiated treaties rather than resorting to violence. This contrasted sharply with the policies of many other colonies.

Cecil Calvert’s vision for Maryland provides a fascinating case study in the pursuit of religious freedom. However, it was not the only experiment in tolerance unfolding in the New World. Another colony, driven by a different set of ideals and spearheaded by a charismatic leader, was also striving to create a society founded on principles of liberty and equality.

Shared Aspirations: The Pursuit of Religious Liberty

While the impetus behind the founding of Maryland and Pennsylvania differed – Catholic haven versus Quaker "Holy Experiment" – a shared aspiration underpinned both ventures: the pursuit of religious liberty. This common ground, however, manifested in distinct ways and faced unique challenges in each colony.

Common Ground: Religious Freedom as a Core Principle

Both Lord Baltimore and William Penn were driven by a desire to create societies where individuals could worship freely, according to the dictates of their own conscience.

This was a radical departure from the religious persecution prevalent in Europe at the time.

For Maryland, this meant providing refuge for Catholics facing discrimination in England. For Pennsylvania, it encompassed a broader vision of religious pluralism.

Penn welcomed members of various Protestant denominations, and even extended a degree of tolerance to other faiths.

Challenges to Tolerance: Ideals vs. Reality

Despite their noble intentions, both colonies encountered challenges in translating their ideals of religious freedom into practice.

In Maryland, the Toleration Act of 1649, while a landmark piece of legislation, was not absolute. It only protected Christian Trinitarians, excluding Jews, Unitarians, and other religious groups. Furthermore, the Act was repealed for a time during a period of Protestant ascendancy in the colony, highlighting the fragility of religious tolerance when it depended on shifting political winds.

In Pennsylvania, while Penn's vision was more inclusive, it too faced limitations. Not everyone embraced the Quaker principles of pacifism and equality.

Conflicts arose with those who did not share these values, particularly as the colony grew and attracted settlers from diverse backgrounds.

The influx of non-Quakers gradually diluted the Quaker influence in the government. This led to tensions regarding issues such as military service and the treatment of Native Americans.

Divergent Paths: Enactment and Perception

The enactment and perception of religious freedom also differed between the two colonies.

Maryland’s tolerance initially stemmed from the pragmatic need to protect its Catholic minority, it was a calculated measure for survival in a predominantly Protestant world.

In contrast, Pennsylvania’s tolerance was rooted in the Quaker belief in the inherent worth and equality of all individuals, regardless of their religious beliefs.

This difference in motivation led to variations in how religious freedom was experienced and understood in each colony.

While Maryland provided a haven for Catholics, it did not necessarily foster a society of equals. Pennsylvania, with its emphasis on Quaker principles, aspired to create a more just and equitable society, albeit one that still faced challenges in fully realizing its ideals.

Ultimately, both Pennsylvania and Maryland represent significant, yet imperfect, experiments in religious tolerance.

Their stories reveal the complexities and challenges inherent in building societies based on principles of liberty and equality, offering valuable lessons for understanding the ongoing struggle for religious freedom in America and beyond.

Shared religious aspirations undoubtedly played a crucial role in the founding of Maryland and Pennsylvania. However, to paint a complete picture, we must look beyond the realm of faith and consider the equally compelling forces of economics and social engineering that shaped these nascent societies.

Beyond Religious Freedom: Economic and Social Considerations

While the promise of religious freedom served as a powerful magnet, attracting settlers seeking refuge from persecution, it was not the sole driving force behind the establishment and subsequent success of Maryland and Pennsylvania. Economic opportunities and carefully planned social structures were equally vital in transforming these colonial visions into thriving realities.

The Lure of Land and Trade

The promise of land ownership, a prospect often unattainable in Europe, proved irresistible to many prospective colonists.

In both Maryland and Pennsylvania, generous land grants were offered as incentives to attract settlers, providing them with the opportunity to build their own farms and establish economic independence.

The headright system in Maryland, for instance, granted land to those who paid for their own passage or for the passage of others, incentivizing immigration and rapidly populating the colony.

Pennsylvania similarly offered land at relatively affordable prices, attracting a diverse population of farmers and artisans eager to own property and improve their economic standing.

Beyond agriculture, trade played a crucial role in the economic development of both colonies. Maryland, with its fertile lands and navigable waterways, quickly became a major exporter of tobacco.

Pennsylvania, strategically located and blessed with abundant resources, developed a diverse economy centered on agriculture, manufacturing, and commerce. Philadelphia, in particular, emerged as a major trading hub, attracting merchants and artisans from across the Atlantic world.

Social and Political Structures: Building a New Society

The founders of Maryland and Pennsylvania also paid careful attention to the social and political structures of their colonies, recognizing that a well-ordered society was essential for long-term stability and prosperity.

Governance and Social Order in Maryland

Maryland, as a proprietary colony under the control of Lord Baltimore, established a hierarchical social structure, with a landed gentry at the top and a large population of tenant farmers and indentured servants below.

The colony's government, while ultimately controlled by the proprietor, included a representative assembly that allowed colonists to participate in the lawmaking process.

This system, while not entirely democratic, provided a degree of self-governance and helped to foster a sense of community among the colonists.

Penn's Vision of an Equitable Society

William Penn, on the other hand, envisioned a more egalitarian society based on Quaker principles of equality and justice.

His Frame of Government, Pennsylvania's first constitution, guaranteed religious freedom, civil liberties, and representative government.

Penn's commitment to fair dealings with Native Americans also contributed to the colony's peaceful relations with its indigenous neighbors, attracting settlers seeking a more harmonious and just society.

The Impact of Proprietary Status

Both Maryland and Pennsylvania were established as proprietary colonies, meaning that they were granted to individuals (Lord Baltimore and William Penn, respectively) who had considerable control over their governance and development.

This status had a significant impact on the colonies' economic and social structures.

The proprietors had the power to appoint governors, make laws (subject to colonial assembly approval), and grant land.

This allowed them to shape the colonies' development in accordance with their own visions and interests.

However, proprietary status also created tensions between the proprietors and the colonists, who often chafed under the proprietors' control and sought greater autonomy.

Despite these tensions, the proprietary system generally proved to be beneficial to both colonies, providing them with strong leadership and a degree of stability that helped them to thrive in the early years of settlement.

The success of Maryland and Pennsylvania in attracting settlers and establishing viable economies hinged not only on religious tolerance but also on the tangible benefits of land ownership and the opportunities presented by burgeoning trade networks. Understanding these intertwined factors provides a more nuanced perspective on the foundations of these pivotal colonies.

The Legacy of Tolerance: Enduring Impact on American Society

The stories of Maryland and Pennsylvania, though distinct in their origins and specific aims, converge to illuminate a shared aspiration: the creation of societies where individuals could exercise freedom of conscience. Their legacies resonate deeply within the fabric of American society, shaping our understanding of religious liberty and the pursuit of a more just and equitable world.

Summarizing the Founding Visions

Maryland, conceived as a haven for Catholics facing persecution in England, stands as an early experiment in legislated religious tolerance. While not without its imperfections and periods of strife, the colony, under the leadership of the Calverts, enshrined the principle of religious freedom in law with the Toleration Act of 1649.

Pennsylvania, born from William Penn's "Holy Experiment," sought to create a society grounded in Quaker principles of pacifism, equality, and religious freedom for all. Penn's vision extended beyond mere tolerance, aiming for a society built on mutual respect and harmonious coexistence among diverse religious groups.

Contributions to American Religious Liberty

Both colonies, in their own ways, served as incubators for the development of religious liberty in America. They attracted settlers from diverse religious backgrounds, fostering a pluralistic environment that challenged the prevailing norms of religious uniformity.

Their embrace of religious tolerance, though imperfect, laid the groundwork for the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion and prohibits government establishment of religion. The experiences of Maryland and Pennsylvania demonstrated both the promise and the challenges of creating societies where religious differences were not a source of conflict but a foundation for strength.

Enduring Relevance in Contemporary Society

The historical legacies of Maryland and Pennsylvania remain profoundly relevant in contemporary society, where issues of religious freedom, diversity, and social justice continue to dominate public discourse.

Their stories remind us that the pursuit of religious liberty is an ongoing process, requiring constant vigilance and a willingness to challenge intolerance and discrimination in all its forms. The successes and failures of these early colonial experiments offer valuable lessons for navigating the complexities of religious pluralism in an increasingly interconnected world.

The Impact on Native Populations

While Maryland and Pennsylvania championed religious freedom for European settlers, their policies had a devastating impact on the native populations who inhabited the land. The arrival of colonists led to displacement, conflict, and the erosion of indigenous cultures and ways of life.

Dispossession and Displacement

The expansion of colonial settlements inevitably encroached upon Native American territories, leading to forced displacement and the loss of ancestral lands. Treaties, often negotiated under duress or through deception, resulted in the gradual dispossession of native populations, pushing them further westward and disrupting their traditional hunting grounds and agricultural practices.

Cultural Disruption and Disease

The introduction of European diseases, to which Native Americans had no immunity, decimated native populations, weakening their ability to resist colonial expansion. Furthermore, the imposition of European cultural norms and religious practices undermined indigenous traditions and spiritual beliefs, contributing to the erosion of Native American identity.

Acknowledging the Complexities

It is crucial to acknowledge the complex and often tragic consequences of colonial policies on Native American populations. While Maryland and Pennsylvania may be celebrated for their contributions to religious freedom, their legacies are also intertwined with the displacement and suffering of indigenous peoples. A complete understanding of their historical significance requires acknowledging both the positive and negative aspects of their impact on American society.

Video: PA & MD's Hidden History: What Were They Founded to Provide?

Play Video