PA Security Cam Laws: Are YOU Breaking the Law?!

Understanding privacy rights is crucial when considering pennsylvania residential security camera laws. The Pennsylvania General Assembly establishes the legal framework for surveillance, impacting how homeowners and renters alike implement security systems. Audio recording introduces another layer of complexity, as wiretapping laws often intersect with visual surveillance, specifically impacting residential use. Consulting with a local attorney who specializes in pennsylvania residential security camera laws can provide personalized guidance, ensuring that your security measures comply with all applicable statutes and avoid potential legal repercussions.

Image taken from the YouTube channel Safewise.com , from the video titled Security Camera Laws, Rights, and Rules | SafeWise FAQ .

The rise of residential security cameras has transformed the way Pennsylvanians protect their homes and families.

These devices, once a luxury, are now commonplace, offering a sense of security and peace of mind.

However, this increased adoption necessitates a thorough understanding of the legal landscape surrounding their use.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and the improper use of security cameras can lead to significant legal repercussions.

The Pervasive Presence of Security Cameras

From doorbell cameras to sophisticated multi-camera systems, video surveillance technology is now deeply integrated into the fabric of Pennsylvania residential life.

This surge in popularity is driven by factors such as affordability, ease of installation, and the perceived increase in safety they provide.

Homeowners seek to deter crime, monitor their property remotely, and gather evidence in case of incidents.

Navigating the Legal Maze: Why Pennsylvania State Law Matters

While security cameras offer undeniable benefits, they also raise complex legal and ethical questions, especially concerning privacy rights.

Pennsylvania State Law governs the use of these devices, and understanding these regulations is paramount.

Key legislation, such as the Pennsylvania Wiretap Act, imposes strict rules on audio recording, which can easily be violated by unsuspecting homeowners.

Furthermore, considerations around trespassing, harassment, and notification requirements add further complexity to the issue.

Purpose of This Guide: Empowering Responsible Surveillance

This guide aims to provide Pennsylvania residents with a clear and comprehensive understanding of their rights and responsibilities regarding security camera usage.

Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge necessary to operate your security systems legally and ethically, avoiding potential legal pitfalls.

We will explore key aspects of Pennsylvania law, including the right to privacy, audio and video recording regulations, and potential liabilities.

By understanding these principles, you can ensure that your security measures are both effective and compliant with the law, protecting your property while respecting the privacy of others.

The purpose of this writing task is to make the text more readable.

From security camera placement to audio recording restrictions, Pennsylvania homeowners face a complex web of regulations. Before delving into the specifics of these laws, it's crucial to understand the bedrock upon which they are built: the right to privacy.

The Privacy Landscape: Pennsylvania's Right to Privacy Explained

At its core, the right to privacy, though not explicitly mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, is a fundamental principle deeply embedded in American and Pennsylvanian jurisprudence. This right dictates that individuals have a legitimate expectation to be free from unwarranted intrusion into their personal lives.

But how does this translate to the context of video and audio surveillance?

The Right to Privacy and Surveillance

The right to privacy is not absolute. It's a nuanced concept that is weighed against other societal interests, such as public safety and crime prevention. When it comes to surveillance, the critical question becomes: did the individual being recorded have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that particular situation?

Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: The Key Concept

The "reasonable expectation of privacy" is the cornerstone of privacy law. Pennsylvania courts use this concept to determine whether a search or seizure (including video or audio recording) violates an individual's rights. Several factors are considered when determining whether a reasonable expectation of privacy exists:

• Location: Where did the recording take place? A public street offers far less expectation of privacy than the inside of a private residence.

• Visibility: Was the activity visible to the public eye? Actions that are readily observable by anyone passing by are less likely to be protected.

• Effort to Conceal: Did the individual take steps to shield their activity from public view? Using curtains, fences, or other barriers suggests an intent to maintain privacy.

• Nature of the Activity: What was the nature of the activity being recorded? Intimate or personal activities carry a higher expectation of privacy than mundane tasks.

How Pennsylvania Courts Assess "Reasonable Expectation"

Pennsylvania courts examine the totality of the circumstances to determine whether a reasonable expectation of privacy existed. This is a fact-specific inquiry, meaning that each case is evaluated on its own merits.

For example, imagine a homeowner installs a security camera that captures footage of their neighbor's backyard. If the neighbor's backyard is fully enclosed by a tall fence, a Pennsylvania court might find that the neighbor had a reasonable expectation of privacy there. The homeowner's surveillance could then be deemed an unlawful intrusion.

Pennsylvania State Law: Safeguarding Your Privacy

Pennsylvania law provides significant protections for individual privacy, particularly through statutes like the Wiretap Act, which places strict controls on audio recordings. While video recording is subject to less stringent regulations than audio, it's crucial to remember that the Fourth Amendment and relevant sections of the Pennsylvania Criminal Code still apply. Pennsylvania also recognizes causes of action for invasion of privacy, such as intrusion upon seclusion, which can be invoked if someone's privacy is violated in an offensive or objectionable way.

In summary, while security cameras can offer valuable protection, they must be deployed with careful consideration of Pennsylvania's privacy laws and the fundamental right to privacy that all Pennsylvanians enjoy. Understanding the concept of "reasonable expectation of privacy" is the first step toward ensuring that your surveillance practices are both effective and legal.

The previous discussion laid the groundwork by illustrating the fundamental right to privacy and its relation to the reasonable expectation of privacy. These considerations form the basis of all privacy-related laws in Pennsylvania, including those governing audio and video recording. Building upon this framework, we now turn our attention to the specific regulations that dictate what's permissible when capturing audio with your security system.

Pennsylvania's Wiretap Act: Audio Recording Restrictions You Need to Know

Pennsylvania takes a particularly stringent stance on audio recording, a fact every homeowner with security cameras must understand. This is largely governed by the state's Wiretap Act, formally known as the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act.

This Act is much broader than just "wiretapping;" it regulates any interception and recording of oral, electronic, or wire communications. The implications for security camera systems are significant.

Understanding the Pennsylvania Wiretap Act

At its core, the Wiretap Act requires two-party consent (also known as all-party consent) for recording audio. This means that, in most situations, all parties involved in a conversation must consent to the recording for it to be legal.

This is a stricter standard than many other states, which operate under a one-party consent rule. The purpose of this is to protect the privacy of individuals engaging in conversation.

This requirement is designed to safeguard private conversations from surreptitious eavesdropping. Failing to get consent can lead to serious legal repercussions.

The One-Party Consent Misconception

It is critical to note that, despite the common misconception, Pennsylvania does not operate under a one-party consent rule in most scenarios. While one-party consent does apply in some limited situations (such as when one party records a conversation they are directly involved in and have a reasonable belief it constitutes evidence of a crime), the general rule is two-party consent.

Many people incorrectly believe that as long as one person involved in the conversation knows they are being recorded, it is legal. In Pennsylvania, this is not true for security cameras in most residential contexts.

The burden of ensuring all parties consent falls squarely on the homeowner. This adds complexity to operating security cameras with audio recording capabilities.

Implications for Security Camera Audio Recording

The two-party consent rule presents significant challenges for homeowners using security cameras with audio recording functionality. Simply put, you cannot legally record conversations occurring on your property without the consent of everyone involved.

This means recording conversations between guests, delivery personnel, or even someone approaching your door could violate the Wiretap Act if you haven't obtained their explicit consent. The location is also an important consideration.

Even if the conversation takes place on your property, individuals may still have a reasonable expectation of privacy, especially in areas not readily visible or intended for public use.

Exceptions and Considerations

While the two-party consent rule is the standard, there are limited exceptions. One is when a party to the communication has given prior consent to such interception. Another exception exists for law enforcement acting under a valid warrant.

For example, if you conspicuously post signage stating that audio recording is in progress, and someone knowingly enters the area, it could be argued that they have implicitly consented to the recording. However, relying solely on implied consent is risky, and the courts may not always agree.

The best practice is to disable audio recording on your security cameras unless you have a clear and legally sound basis for recording (e.g., you have obtained explicit consent from all parties).

Potential Legal Consequences of Violating the Wiretap Act

The consequences of violating Pennsylvania's Wiretap Act can be severe. Violators can face both criminal charges and civil lawsuits.

Criminally, illegal wiretapping is a felony offense, punishable by substantial fines and imprisonment. Civilly, individuals who have been illegally recorded can sue for damages, including compensation for emotional distress, punitive damages, and attorney's fees.

Moreover, any evidence obtained in violation of the Wiretap Act is inadmissible in court.

This means that if you illegally record a crime occurring on your property, that recording cannot be used as evidence against the perpetrator. These penalties highlight the importance of strictly adhering to the law and seeking legal counsel if you have any doubts about the legality of your audio recording practices.

The previous discussion laid the groundwork by illustrating the fundamental right to privacy and its relation to the reasonable expectation of privacy. These considerations form the basis of all privacy-related laws in Pennsylvania, including those governing audio and video recording. Building upon this framework, we now turn our attention to the specific regulations that dictate what's permissible when capturing video with your security system.

Video Surveillance: Navigating the Legal Boundaries in Pennsylvania

While Pennsylvania law places significant restrictions on audio recording, video surveillance operates under a somewhat different set of rules. The legal landscape for video recording is shaped by a combination of constitutional principles, statutory law, and common-sense considerations about privacy.

Understanding these nuances is critical to ensuring your security system remains on the right side of the law.

The Fourth Amendment and Pennsylvania Video Surveillance

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. While this primarily applies to law enforcement, its principles have implications for private video surveillance.

The key concept here is the "reasonable expectation of privacy." You cannot record video in areas where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as bathrooms or changing rooms.

However, recording in public spaces or areas visible from public spaces is generally permissible, provided it does not violate other laws, such as those related to harassment or stalking.

Security Camera Placement: A Crucial Factor

Camera placement is paramount in determining the legality of video surveillance. Directing a camera at a neighbor's window, for instance, could be considered an invasion of privacy, especially if the window provides a view into their bedroom or bathroom.

The angle and scope of your cameras should be carefully considered to ensure they primarily capture activity within your own property boundaries.

Overly intrusive surveillance can lead to legal challenges, even if you are technically recording from your own property.

Pennsylvania Criminal Code and Video Surveillance

Several sections of the Pennsylvania Criminal Code are relevant to video surveillance. While there isn't one specific law solely dedicated to video recording, existing laws can be applied to address abusive or illegal surveillance practices.

Harassment Statutes: Pennsylvania's harassment laws can come into play if video surveillance is used to intentionally annoy, alarm, or threaten another person. Repeatedly filming a neighbor, even if they are visible from your property, could potentially constitute harassment.

Stalking Statutes: Similarly, stalking laws prohibit engaging in a course of conduct that places another person in reasonable fear of bodily injury. Using video surveillance to track someone's movements and cause them fear could be considered stalking.

Peeping Tom Laws: These laws generally prohibit surreptitiously viewing or photographing another person in a state of nudity or undergarments, without their consent, in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. This could potentially apply if a camera is strategically placed to capture such images.

Balancing Security Needs with Privacy Rights

The legal framework surrounding video surveillance in Pennsylvania necessitates a balancing act between your right to protect your property and the privacy rights of others.

While video recording in public areas is generally permissible, it's essential to avoid intrusive or harassing surveillance practices.

By carefully considering camera placement, respecting property boundaries, and being mindful of the potential impact on your neighbors' privacy, you can utilize security cameras effectively without running afoul of the law.

The previous discussion laid the groundwork by illustrating the fundamental right to privacy and its relation to the reasonable expectation of privacy. These considerations form the basis of all privacy-related laws in Pennsylvania, including those governing audio and video recording. Building upon this framework, we now turn our attention to the specific regulations that dictate what's permissible when capturing video with your security system.

Avoiding Legal Trouble: Trespassing and Harassment Concerns with Security Cameras

While enhancing your home security is a primary goal, it's easy to unintentionally cross legal lines with video surveillance. Pennsylvania law recognizes that even without physical intrusion, the use of security cameras can sometimes constitute trespassing or harassment, leading to legal repercussions. Understanding these potential pitfalls is essential for responsible camera usage.

The Fine Line: Trespassing by Camera

Trespassing is generally understood as entering or remaining on another's property without permission. But could your security camera be committing a form of trespassing?

Pennsylvania law protects individuals from unwanted intrusions onto their property. While a camera itself isn't physically stepping onto someone else's land, its lens can create a virtual presence.

If a camera consistently captures images of a neighbor's private backyard or interior spaces, it could be argued that you are effectively extending your presence onto their property without their consent. This is especially true if the camera's placement or zoom capabilities allow for detailed surveillance of areas not readily visible from public spaces.

Legal Precedents: The Visual Intrusion Argument

Although specific case law on "trespassing by camera" might be limited in Pennsylvania, existing legal principles regarding nuisance and privacy can be applied.

If your camera's surveillance activities significantly interfere with a neighbor's reasonable enjoyment of their property, it could be considered a nuisance.

Furthermore, persistent and intrusive video recording might be construed as an invasion of privacy, especially if it captures sensitive or intimate details of their lives.

Harassment and Security Cameras: When Surveillance Becomes Stalking

Even if your camera stays within your property lines, its use could be interpreted as harassment if it's directed at a specific individual or group.

Pennsylvania law prohibits harassment, which includes engaging in a course of conduct or repeatedly committing acts that alarm or annoy another person and serve no legitimate purpose.

If your camera's placement, movement, or recording patterns suggest an intent to target, intimidate, or cause emotional distress to a neighbor, you could face harassment charges.

The Importance of Intent and Reasonable Purpose

The key factor in determining whether camera use constitutes harassment is intent. Is the camera genuinely intended for security purposes, or is it being used to monitor, track, or intimidate a specific person?

If the surveillance serves no legitimate purpose other than to annoy or alarm someone, it's more likely to be deemed harassment.

It's also important to consider the reasonableness of your actions. Would a reasonable person feel harassed or intimidated by the camera's presence and operation?

Hypothetical Scenarios: Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Let's consider a few scenarios to illustrate these points:

• Scenario 1: The Overly Curious Camera. You install a high-resolution camera that can clearly see into your neighbor's living room windows. Even though the camera is technically on your property, its ability to capture intimate details of their private life could be seen as trespassing or harassment.
• Scenario 2: The Constant Monitor. You repeatedly adjust your camera to follow your neighbor's movements whenever they are in their yard. This persistent tracking could be viewed as stalking or harassment.
• Scenario 3: The Boundary Dispute. You place a camera at the edge of your property line, intentionally capturing a portion of your neighbor's driveway. This could be interpreted as an unauthorized intrusion onto their property.

Steps to Minimize Risk

To avoid potential legal trouble, consider these steps:

• Focus on your own property. Ensure your cameras primarily capture images within your property boundaries.
• Avoid aiming cameras directly at neighboring properties. Adjust the angle to minimize the capture of neighboring yards or homes.
• Be mindful of privacy. Don't record areas where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy, even on your own property (e.g., inside your own bathroom).
• Communicate with your neighbors. Openly discuss your security measures with your neighbors to address any concerns and foster a sense of transparency.

By understanding the potential legal ramifications of improper camera usage and taking proactive steps to avoid these pitfalls, you can protect your property while respecting the privacy and rights of those around you.

The previous discussion laid the groundwork by illustrating the fundamental right to privacy and its relation to the reasonable expectation of privacy. These considerations form the basis of all privacy-related laws in Pennsylvania, including those governing audio and video recording. Building upon this framework, we now turn our attention to the specific regulations that dictate what's permissible when capturing video with your security system.

Disclosure and Notification: Are You Required to Inform Others About Your Cameras?

The question of whether you need to tell people they are being recorded by your security cameras is a complex one, balancing legal requirements with ethical considerations.

In Pennsylvania, the law doesn't explicitly mandate notification of video surveillance in most residential scenarios.

However, the absence of a strict legal obligation doesn't negate the importance of transparency and respect for privacy.

The Letter of the Law: Examining Notification Requirements

Pennsylvania law lacks a specific statute requiring homeowners to notify visitors or neighbors about the presence of video surveillance cameras on their property.

Unlike some states that have explicit signage requirements, Pennsylvania law focuses more on how the cameras are used, particularly concerning audio recording (as discussed earlier under the Wiretap Act) and avoiding trespass or harassment.

Therefore, unless audio is being recorded, or the cameras are being used in a way that violates someone's reasonable expectation of privacy or constitutes harassment, simply having cameras is typically not a legal issue regarding notification.

However, it's crucial to remember that the legal landscape can be nuanced, and interpretations can vary.

Best Practices: Informing Visitors and Neighbors

Even without a strict legal mandate, informing visitors and neighbors about your security cameras is a sound practice for several reasons.

Transparency fosters trust and avoids misunderstandings.

Neighbors are more likely to view your cameras as a security enhancement for the community rather than an invasion of their privacy if they know about them beforehand.

Similarly, informing guests entering your home is simply courteous and avoids potential discomfort or suspicion.

There are several ways to effectively communicate the presence of cameras:

• Signage: Visible signs stating "Video Surveillance in Use" are a simple and effective method.
• Verbal Notification: Informing guests directly upon arrival is a personal touch that demonstrates respect.
• Neighborly Communication: A friendly conversation with your neighbors about your security measures can alleviate concerns and build goodwill.

Ethical Considerations: When Notification Becomes Imperative

Beyond legal requirements, ethical considerations often suggest that notification is the right thing to do.

Imagine discovering you've been recorded without your knowledge or consent. The feeling of unease or violation is something most people would want to avoid inflicting on others.

Situations where notification is ethically recommended include:

• Cameras covering shared spaces: If your camera captures footage of a shared driveway or walkway, informing your neighbors is essential.
• Extended stays: House guests or contractors staying for an extended period deserve to know about the presence of cameras within the home.
• Sensitive areas: While you should avoid pointing cameras at sensitive areas on neighboring properties, if it's unavoidable, notification is critical.

By prioritizing transparency and respect for privacy, you can ensure your security system serves its intended purpose without infringing on the rights and comfort of those around you. Ultimately, a proactive and considerate approach is the best way to maintain positive relationships and avoid potential disputes.

The previous discussion laid the groundwork by illustrating the fundamental right to privacy and its relation to the reasonable expectation of privacy. These considerations form the basis of all privacy-related laws in Pennsylvania, including those governing audio and video recording. Building upon this framework, we now turn our attention to the specific regulations that dictate what's permissible when capturing video with your security system.

Real-World Examples: Case Studies and Scenarios Involving Security Camera Laws

To truly understand the implications of Pennsylvania's security camera laws, it's essential to move beyond theoretical explanations and examine how these laws are applied in practice.

This section delves into real-world case studies and hypothetical scenarios that illustrate the potential legal issues homeowners might encounter.

By analyzing these examples, we can gain a clearer understanding of the legal boundaries and best practices for using security cameras responsibly and lawfully.

Analyzing Pennsylvania Court Cases Involving Security Camera Footage

While there may not be a plethora of cases specifically addressing residential security camera footage in Pennsylvania, existing case law provides valuable insight into how courts interpret privacy rights, the Wiretap Act, and related legal concepts.

For instance, cases involving hidden cameras in the workplace or during private conversations can offer precedents for understanding what constitutes a "reasonable expectation of privacy" in the context of video and audio recording.

Commonwealth v. Alexander: A Cautionary Tale of Audio Recording

Although not directly related to security cameras, the Commonwealth v. Alexander case (551 Pa. 1, 708 A.2d 1251 (1998)) is a landmark decision regarding Pennsylvania's Wiretap Act.

It highlights the importance of obtaining consent from all parties before recording a conversation.

This case reinforces the strict interpretation of the Wiretap Act in Pennsylvania and serves as a reminder that recording audio without proper consent, even with a security camera, can lead to severe legal consequences.

Applying Precedent to Security Camera Scenarios

While specific residential security camera cases may be limited, the principles established in cases like Commonwealth v. Alexander are applicable.

If your security camera captures audio, you must ensure you are complying with the one-party consent rule.

This means you cannot intentionally record conversations where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy without at least one participant's consent.

Hypothetical Scenarios: Navigating Legal Gray Areas

To further illustrate the complexities of security camera law, let's consider some hypothetical scenarios:

Scenario 1: The Overzealous Neighbor

Imagine a homeowner installs a security camera that captures not only their property but also a significant portion of their neighbor's backyard.

The neighbor feels their privacy is being violated and files a lawsuit.

In this scenario, the court would likely assess whether the neighbor had a reasonable expectation of privacy in their backyard.

Factors considered might include the height and angle of the camera, the visibility of the yard from public areas, and whether the homeowner had a legitimate security concern justifying the camera's placement.

If the court finds that the camera unreasonably infringes on the neighbor's privacy, the homeowner could be ordered to reposition or remove the camera.

Scenario 2: The Accidental Audio Recording

A homeowner installs a security camera with audio recording capabilities to monitor their front porch for package thefts.

Unbeknownst to them, the camera records a private conversation between two delivery drivers who are standing on the porch during their break.

In this case, even though the homeowner didn't intend to record the conversation, they could still be in violation of the Wiretap Act if they didn't obtain consent from at least one of the drivers.

This scenario highlights the importance of being aware of your camera's capabilities and taking steps to avoid inadvertently recording private conversations.

Scenario 3: The HOA Dispute

A homeowner lives in a community governed by a Homeowners Association (HOA) that has strict rules about exterior modifications.

The homeowner installs a security camera without obtaining HOA approval, arguing that it's necessary for their safety.

The HOA demands that the homeowner remove the camera, citing violation of the community's covenants.

This scenario illustrates that, in addition to state law, homeowners must also comply with any applicable HOA rules regarding security camera installation.

Failure to do so can result in fines, legal action, or even forced removal of the camera.

By examining these case studies and hypothetical scenarios, Pennsylvania homeowners can gain a better understanding of the legal landscape surrounding security camera usage.

Being proactive, respecting privacy rights, and seeking legal guidance when needed are essential steps in ensuring compliance with the law.

When to Consult an Attorney: Protecting Yourself from Legal Issues

The complexities of Pennsylvania's security camera laws, coupled with the ever-evolving interpretation of privacy rights, can create a legal minefield for homeowners. While this guide aims to provide a comprehensive overview, it's crucial to recognize that it doesn't constitute legal advice. Situations involving security cameras can quickly become complex, and personalized legal counsel is often the best course of action.

Navigating the intricacies of the Wiretap Act, understanding property line disputes, and interpreting "reasonable expectation of privacy" often require the expertise of a legal professional.

Proactive Consultation: Preventing Legal Problems Before They Arise

It's often wise to seek legal guidance before a potential issue escalates.

Assessing Your Camera System's Legality

If you have any doubts about the legality of your existing security camera setup, consulting an attorney is a prudent step. They can review your camera placement, audio recording practices, and notification procedures to ensure compliance with Pennsylvania law.

This proactive approach can help you identify and address potential legal vulnerabilities before they result in complaints, lawsuits, or even criminal charges.

Understanding Complex Property Line Issues

Boundary disputes are a common source of contention between neighbors, and security cameras can exacerbate these tensions. If your camera's field of view extends beyond your property line, an attorney can advise you on your rights and obligations.

They can help you navigate tricky situations involving shared driveways, easements, or unclear property boundaries, preventing potential harassment or trespassing claims.

Reactive Consultation: Addressing Existing Legal Challenges

There are also situations where legal challenges have already materialized.

Receiving a Cease and Desist Letter

If you receive a cease and desist letter from a neighbor or their attorney concerning your security cameras, it's crucial to take it seriously. Consulting with an attorney immediately is essential to understand the validity of the claims and develop an appropriate response.

Ignoring such a letter could lead to further legal action, including a lawsuit.

Facing Criminal Charges Related to Audio or Video Recording

Violations of Pennsylvania's Wiretap Act can result in serious criminal penalties. If you're facing charges related to illegal audio or video recording, it's imperative to seek legal representation immediately.

An attorney can protect your rights, investigate the circumstances of the alleged violation, and build a strong defense on your behalf.

Being Sued for Harassment or Invasion of Privacy

Even if you haven't been charged with a crime, you could still be sued for harassment or invasion of privacy related to your security camera usage. An attorney can assess the merits of the lawsuit, advise you on your legal options, and represent you in court.

Choosing the Right Attorney

When selecting an attorney to assist you with security camera-related legal issues, look for someone with experience in:

• Pennsylvania privacy law
• The Wiretap Act
• Property law
• Criminal defense (if facing criminal charges)

Don't hesitate to ask potential attorneys about their experience with similar cases and their approach to resolving these types of disputes.

Video: PA Security Cam Laws: Are YOU Breaking the Law?!

Play Video

Navigating pennsylvania residential security camera laws can be tricky, right? Hopefully, this gave you a better understanding of what to watch out for. Stay safe, stay informed, and remember to double-check those angles!